How Satellite Technology is Vital to Resilient Networks – The National Law Review

Ukraine has suffered multiple internet and connectivity outages since the Russian invasion began.  Seeking to restore vital connectivity to his citizens in the face of the Russian military threat, Vice Prime Minster Mykhailo Fedorov tweeted at SpaceX CEO Elon Musk asking for help. After receiving what is arguably the first regulatory approval by Tweet, Musk and SpaceX responded by shipping the Starlink user terminals to Ukraine on March 1, 2022.1  The non-geostationary satellite orbit (“NGSO”) satellite broadband service now serves as a vital tool for connectivity where traditional terrestrial infrastructure fell short.2
Over the past two decades, there have been numerous examples of the fallibility of terrestrial telecommunication infrastructure when natural or man-made disasters strike, leaving thousands without reliable communications, including emergency responders.  In order to restore network connectivity, federal and local governments, as well as emergency response teams, often turn to satellite network operators to provide rapid, reliable, easy-to-deploy connectivity solutions to keep communities connected.  Despite the reliance on satellite connectivity in the wake of devastating emergency situations, governments—including the United States—have failed to place significant emphasis on or investment into satellite technology during communications resiliency planning.3  Given the advantages of satellite connectivity in emergency response and preparedness, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and other government agencies, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), should proactively plan for its use, rather than merely as a reactionary response during and in the aftermath of a crisis.
Satellite networks can be incorporated into resiliency frameworks to provide true path and technology diversity.  Once a satellite network is launched into orbit, all that is needed to deliver reliable connectivity service is a terminal on the ground, which can often be set up in a matter of minutes.  In the event of power disruptions, satellites can be powered by solar panels and battery packs, making the technology uniquely suited for natural disasters and armed conflicts, during which power outages are frequent.4  As such, satellite technology has an essential role to play in ensuring connectivity in the face of natural disasters, fiber cuts, and other emergency situations.  Satellite connectivity provides much needed redundancy, more resilient networks, and in turn, better emergency communications and response.
In fact, satellite technology has played an important role in emergency response in the United States for decades.  One week after Hurricane Maria made landfall in Puerto Rico, 9-1-1 services remained compromised and over 90 percent of cell sites were out of service.5  Satellite technology was vital to restoring connectivity in the aftermath of the storm.  FEMA distributed satellite phones to the island’s leadership.  Companies deployed VSAT terminals, base stations,  satellite mobile devices, and solar generators to restore 4G/LTE, create hot spots, enable medical facilities and pharmacies, and facilitate insurance claim processing.6
Stakeholders in the satellite industry have long encouraged the FCC to take proactive steps to explicitly integrate satellite technology into its resilience planning.  Each year, there are countless instances where satellite companies are called upon to restore connectivity following natural disasters, fiber cuts, and manmade crises.  As satellite technology continues its rapid evolution, its vitality to network resiliency will only grow.
Recent history has again demonstrated the clear value of satellite communications technology in emergency response.  This “life saving” technology, in the words of Vice Prime Minster Fedorov, allows families displaced or separated by conflict to communicate and aids emergency workers in locating and assisting the injured, not to mention fostering strategic government and military communications.7  The Ukraine-Russia conflict provides another clear illustration of why satellite connectivity should be a key component in the FCC’s pre-existing plan to address communication resiliency preparedness.  By preparing for use of satellite technology before the need arises, the U.S. government can ensure minimal disruption in critical communications at those unique and unexpected moments when they are needed most.  In order to foster networks that are more resilient to extreme weather events, conflicts, and accidents, the FCC should prioritize, plan for, and incentivize the use of satellite technology.
[1] Mike Ives, Satellite Internet Terminals, Sent by Elon Musk, Arrive in Ukraine The New York Times (Mar. 1, 2022),
[2] Chelsea Gohd, How Will Ukraine Keep SpaceX’s Starlink Internet Service Online? (last visited Mar. 30, 2022).
[3] See, e.g., Emma Schwartz & Laura Sullivan, FEMA Report Acknowledges Failures in Puerto Rico Response, PBS (July 13, 2018)
[4] Chelsea Gohd, How Will Ukraine Keep SpaceX’s Starlink Internet Service Online?
[5] Communications Status Report for Areas Impacted by Hurricane Maria,  FCC (Sept. 28, 2017)….
[6] Tony Bardo, Path Diversity with Satellite Connectivity Fortifies Comms for Energy Response, SatMagazine, (last visited Mar. 11, 2022).
[7] Chelsea Gohd, How Will Ukraine Keep SpaceX’s Starlink Internet Service Online?
About this Author
Jodi Goldberg is an associate in the Corporate and Securities Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. 
Areas of Practice
Jodi’s practice is focused on technology and telecommunications, with a particular emphasis on satellite, space, wireless, and new technologies.  Jodi advocates for clients in FCC and NOAA regulatory proceedings, advises on licensing, allocation, and transactional matters, and counsels clients on new technologies and services.  Jodi has experience with managing global managed-networks, including working with regulators in…
Emily Dalessio is an associate in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.
Areas of Practice
Emily represents clients in complex business matters in arbitration, as well as in state and federal courts.  She has experience litigating claims involving breach of contract, defamation, and various issues related to telecommunications.
She also advises cable operators and other broadband providers regarding pole attachment rates and access to rights-of-way.
Emily is committed to her pro bono practice.  She represents…
As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.


Article Categories:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *